About this directory

AI Use Cases Index is a free reference of AI use cases that are actually deployed in businesses, organised by industry, department and value lever. Every page is public, and there is nothing to sign up for in order to read one.

How a use case gets in

Every entry must describe one problem and one mechanism. “AI for HR” does not qualify; “screen inbound CVs against a structured scorecard” does. Each entry carries at least one source describing a real deployment or a credible pilot with numbers, and every source is shown with its domain so you can weigh it yourself. Speculative pieces about what AI could theoretically do are rejected.

Where a claim is corroborated by several independent publications, we list them all. Independence is what counts, not volume — four restatements of one press release are one source, not four.

How scoring works

Three scores, each 1 to 5. They do not all run in the same direction: impact is better high, while implementation effort and data requirement are better low. That is why every score is shown as words — “Very high impact”, “Low effort”, “Advanced data needed” — rather than as a bare number you would have to decode.

The rubric, at its anchor points
Dimension135
ImpactMarginal convenienceMeaningful savings for one teamChanges a core P&L line
Implementation effortConfigure an existing tool, daysCustom workflow, 3–8 weeksMulti-quarter build, org change
Data requirementWorks with documents any company hasNeeds one clean system of recordMature structured data across systems

Where a score is genuinely between two values, we pick the lower impact and the higher effort — a directory that oversells is worth nothing.

A use case is marked a quick win when impact is 3 or above and effort is 2 or below.

Outcome numbers

Outcomes are published as ranges with sources, never as promises. Where a range cannot be sourced, the outcome is described qualitatively and no number is given.

Who maintains this

Maintained by the AI Use Cases Index editorial team. Every entry is researched against published sources, scored with the rubric above, and dated so you can see how current it is. Where a claim cannot be sourced, it is not published.

Found something wrong or out of date? The fastest fix is to tell us which page and which claim, and we will re-check it against its sources.